<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ERWIN.co &#187; ZhuRongji</title>
	<atom:link href="http://erwin.co/tag/zhurongji/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://erwin.co</link>
	<description>thoroughly chinafied american business geek in shanghai</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:31:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SOEs: Buy High. Sell Higher?</title>
		<link>http://erwin.co/2010/01/05/soes-buy-high-sell-higher/</link>
		<comments>http://erwin.co/2010/01/05/soes-buy-high-sell-higher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erwin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China (中国）]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics （经济学）]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ChinaBubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZhuRongji]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erwin.co/?p=764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ignoring the Dubai Crisis and Bubble Concerns, Chinese SOEs Continue Playing &#8220;Land King&#8221; Another 19 real estate companies also showed interest in the land bought by Sino Ocean, among them Gemdale Group, a private real estate company. It didn&#8217;t bother to bid, though, as prices were too high and a huge challenge for a private [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.chinastakes.com/2009/12/ignoring-the-dubai-crisis-and-bubble-concerns-chinese-soes-continue-playing-land-king.html">Ignoring the Dubai Crisis and Bubble Concerns, Chinese SOEs Continue Playing &#8220;Land King&#8221;</a></p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Another 19 real estate companies also showed interest in the land bought by Sino Ocean, among them Gemdale Group, a private real estate company. It didn&#8217;t bother to bid, though, as prices were too high and a huge challenge for a private company. In the current environment, SOEs are able to take significantly greater risks than private enterprises.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>My closest friend in Shanghai is also a land developer (房地产开发商) and I&#8217;ve heard the exact same story from him. Every time they try to bid on a project, some SOE backed business comes in at a higher price. No matter how much you are willing to offer, the SOE backed group raise the bid until they get the property.</p>

<p>Do SOE&#8217;s have a secret for generating better ROI than experienced, well managed, privately held developers? If they do, they should start a training academy teaching their &#8220;post-market economics efficiency&#8221;. Most likely this will be a lesson in buying high and selling low.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Zhang Shuguang, chairman of <a href="http://www.unirule.org.cn/">Unirule Institute of Economics</a>, says, &#8220;Real estate policy next year is a choice among contradictions and big changes may not take place. Tightening policies will cause the real estate bubble to burst, resulting in economic problems, while excessive stimulus will bring a bigger bubble and greater risks.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>

<p>You&#8217;ve got a bubble on your hands. Choices I&#8217;m aware of are a) soft landing or b) hard landing. Sounds like the Chinese plan is to &#8220;manage the bubble&#8221;. Good luck with that.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The dilemma is more obvious for local governments. Zhang Shuguang says that half of local government income is real estate-related, and local real estate policies will not see big changes. Preferential policies may be fine-tuned instead of cancelled.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>In case you want to know &#8220;why&#8221; the bureaucrats what to &#8220;manage the bubble&#8221; instead of fixing the economy? Because the bubble is putting money in their budgets. The bigger the budget, the bigger the kickback.</p>

<p>Can we bring <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhu_Rongji">Zhu Rongji</a> back the way Deng Xiaoping was brought back? He&#8217;s ceased to exist as a public figure since 2003 &#8211; just about the time the economy started going way off track.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Zhu tackled the problems of an excessive money supply, rising prices, and a chaotic financial market stemming, in large measure, from runaway investments in fixed assets. After four years of successful macro-economic controls with curbing inflation as the primary task, an overheated Chinese economy cooled down to a &#8220;soft landing&#8221;.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Unfortunately, he&#8217;s not likely to be restored because:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Zhu has a reputation for being a strong, strict administrator, intolerant of flunkeyism, nepotism, and a dilatory style of work. For his hard work ethic and general truthful and transparent attitude, he is generally considered one of the most popular Communist officials in mainland China.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://erwin.co/2010/01/05/soes-buy-high-sell-higher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

